Interagency Prevention and Planning Failures- Hurrican Andrew Research Paper

Interagency Prevention and Planning Failures-Hurrican Andrew - Research Paper Example With every debacle, the US government set up various offices and bodies to give assistance and aid to overcomers of the consequence. The strategy for giving guide and help had away from of power and an away from of which organization was to do what errands (Nudell, 1988). Sadly, the exactness with which these offices should work didn't occur. These offices had transformed into ‘stove pipes’ and didn't help out one another. With almost no interagency collaboration, the different government organizations that were seized with giving assistance were left weak and messed up in administration and formality. The outcome was that a large number of individuals couldn't be emptied to stations manufactured explicitly for such assignments. Billions of dollars in reserves that were utilized for foundation were squandered (Herman, 2010). This report talks about and centers around the poor interagency anticipation and arranging that added to the calamity after Hurricane Andrew struck Florida. Morton (2008) has remarked on the structure and working of the national security and the barrier powers that have questionable security jobs and capacity and which serve the President of USA. These offices have solid workforce societies and a profound situated want to ensure their turf and this made oven pies in the branches of national security. These elements will in general work in disengagement and want to be the conveyor of fortunate or unfortunate news. Different divisions, for example, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence - ODNI, Department of Justice - DOJ under different acts extending from the National Security Act 1947 to the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act, 2004 have never figured out how to acquire the different offices to act an agreeable way and where a typical culture exists. The different national security acts and state security at the national and state levels are lopsided. A basic audit of Shelby (2011) shows that when